Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, andrea gelmini <bungle(at)linux(dot)it>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo
Date: 2001-11-12 19:23:51
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0111121940370.640-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian writes:

> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:46:37AM +0100, andrea gelmini wrote:
> > > > Please correct your patch and I mean will no problem add it to
> > > > official code.
> > > ok, tell me if this is good.
> >
> > It seems good now.
> >
> > I unsure if now is good time add it into 7.2 when we are in the beta
> > time. But it's simple, short patch into contrib. Bruce?
>
> Tough call. It is /contrib, which can get changes pretty late. Let's
> see if someone else has an opinion.

I think pg_dumplo is mostly obsolete, no?

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-11-12 19:24:50 Re: [ODBC] MD5 support for ODBC
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-12 19:23:23 Re: [ODBC] MD5 support for ODBC