Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, andrea gelmini <bungle(at)linux(dot)it>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo
Date: 2001-11-12 19:19:27
Message-ID: 200111121919.fACJJRY14016@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> > Tough call. It is /contrib, which can get changes pretty late. Let's
> > see if someone else has an opinion.
>
> I think pg_dumplo is mostly obsolete, no?

I think it is there for older releases?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-11-12 19:22:13 Re: Patch for Makefile race against current cvs
Previous Message Robert Down 2001-11-12 18:53:45 absolute() error with jdbc7.1-1.2