Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Mike Castle <dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Date: 2000-12-28 01:09:57
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0012280206370.1006-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mike Castle writes:

> Linux acts somewhat differently with respect to LD_* variables when
> compared to other systems.

Not really.

> Speaking of administrative nightmares, did I read correctly that 7.1
> now users -R by default when linking? Ack! Doesn't that make it nearly
> impossible for an administrator to move libraries around as necessary?

If you move files to a place that is different from the one they are
supposed to be in you're going to have more severe problems than this one.
This is not only true for PostgreSQL.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Holmes 2000-12-28 01:30:22 Compiling on SCO
Previous Message postgres 2000-12-28 01:09:41 Re: Auto Increment