From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | David Hartwig <daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com> |
Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 |
Date: | 1998-07-16 17:30:25 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.980716182806.1202S-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, David Hartwig wrote:
> This is really big for the ODBCers. (And I suspect for JDBCers too.) Many
> desktop libraries and end-user tools depend on this "record set" strategy to
> operate effectively.
Although I haven't seen what they produce, it is possible that JBuilder
and others do have this affect with JDBC.
However, not all JDBC applications have this problem. Infact the majority
I've seen only produce much simpler queries.
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk or petermount(at)earthling(dot)net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
************ Someday I may rebuild this signature completely ;-) ************
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeffrey Napolitano | 1998-07-16 17:44:28 | pg_version and version |
Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 1998-07-16 17:27:03 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ocie | 1998-07-16 18:10:18 | Re: [HACKERS] How about re-moderating pgsql-announce? |
Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 1998-07-16 17:27:03 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeffrey Napolitano | 1998-07-16 17:53:20 | "static" libraries? |
Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 1998-07-16 17:27:03 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 |