| From: | Brad DeJong <Brad(dot)Dejong(at)infor(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Date: | 2016-11-29 14:57:46 |
| Message-ID: | F8F0ED16CB59F247B7EFD0E1DB34BC1F5CB5AB6D@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Vladimir wrote:
> Well, current milestone has slipped a bit
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/milestones, however there are just a
> couple of issues due.
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/690 "executeBatch vs
> serverprepared=0" -- needs review
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/611 "feat: allow byte[] and String to
> be accessed as .getLob, and .getClob" -- test should be reviewed (e.g.
> assert messages added)
I just looked at pull 690 and I think the change has unintended side effects. Comment added to the pull.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jorge Solórzano | 2016-11-29 16:57:54 | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2016-11-29 11:42:57 | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |