| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brad DeJong <Brad(dot)Dejong(at)infor(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Date: | 2016-11-29 11:42:57 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHJezjOuyk8BfxU6OSpwG_yeDyymjTLpF-b4uKejJ_J=fg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 29 November 2016 at 01:19, Brad DeJong <Brad(dot)Dejong(at)infor(dot)com> wrote:
> Vladimir wrote:
> > Well, current milestone has slipped a bit
> > https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/milestones, however there are just a
> > couple of issues due.
> > https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/690 "executeBatch vs
> > serverprepared=0" -- needs review
> > https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/611 "feat: allow byte[] and
> String to
> > be accessed as .getLob, and .getClob" -- test should be reviewed (e.g.
> > assert messages added)
>
> I read this as a request for assistance in reviewing these pulls. I looked
> over the byte[]/Blob part of pull 611 (PgByteaBlob and PgByteaBlobTest) and
> submitted comments. AbstractBasicLob and PgResultSet changes look good. I
> did not look over the String/Clob part yet.
>
>
@Brad,
this is great, thanks!
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brad DeJong | 2016-11-29 14:57:46 | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Previous Message | Brad DeJong | 2016-11-29 06:19:21 | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |