Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion

From: Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Date: 2016-11-29 16:57:54
Message-ID: CA+cVU8Nqa75thp2kV6OJR39gM5xEbsfXCieFTQ224jHMnfE23w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Vladimir, what do you think about using classifier in pgjdbc? It probably
can simplify build of different jar and at the same time have proper
versioning in maven.

In maven rules 42.0.0.jre7 > 42.0.0 (jre8) so this should help with correct
versioning.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3092085/building-same-project-in-maven-with-different-artifactid-based-on-jdk-used

El lun., 28 de nov. de 2016 3:17 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> escribió:

> I've pushed 42.0.0-SNAPSHOT to the pgjdbc/master.
>
> Vladimir
>
--

Jorge Solórzano
me.jorsol.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-11-29 17:37:06 Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Previous Message Brad DeJong 2016-11-29 14:57:46 Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion