| From: | "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
| Date: | 2008-09-24 18:55:10 |
| Message-ID: | F26C4662-4C95-4D50-B0CC-16C14245C6CD@themactionfaction.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sep 24, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Peter,
>
>> Yeah, but do we even have the slightest bit of information about
>> what exactly would be required to achieve the required levels? And
>> whether this patch does it? And whether there would be
>> alternative, more desirable ways to achieve a similar level?
>
> Actually, I have some direct communication that SEPostgres will lead
> to PostgreSQL being widely adopted in at least one US government
> agency. Can't say more, of course. ;-)
And the consideration is predicated on the PostgreSQL community
accepting the patch? This sounds like an opportunity for one of the
numerous "enterprise" spin-offs.
Cheers,
M
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-09-24 18:56:30 | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
| Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2008-09-24 18:45:09 | Re: pgsql: Make LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE database-level settings. |