| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
| Date: | 2008-09-24 18:38:36 |
| Message-ID: | 48DA892C.4040203@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter,
> Yeah, but do we even have the slightest bit of information about what
> exactly would be required to achieve the required levels? And whether
> this patch does it? And whether there would be alternative, more
> desirable ways to achieve a similar level?
Actually, I have some direct communication that SEPostgres will lead to
PostgreSQL being widely adopted in at least one US government agency.
Can't say more, of course. ;-)
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-09-24 18:43:51 | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-09-24 17:30:43 | Re: FSM, now without WAL-logging |