RE: Timeout parameters

From: "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Fabien COELHO' <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Timeout parameters
Date: 2019-04-04 08:19:55
Message-ID: EDA4195584F5064680D8130B1CA91C45411DEB@G01JPEXMBYT04
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> From: Jamison, Kirk <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
> As for socket_timeout, I agree that this can be discussed further.
Yes, probably.

> From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
> * About socket_timeout v12 patch, I'm not sure there is a consensus.
I think so too. I just made the patch being able to be committed anytime.

Finally, I rebased all the patches because they have come not to be applied to the updated PG.
Unlike before, note that the current socket_timeout patch premiss to be TCP_interface patch.

Best regards,
Ryohei Nagaura

Attachment Content-Type Size
TCP_backend_v20.patch application/octet-stream 7.8 KB
TCP_interface_v20.patch application/octet-stream 3.7 KB
socket_timeout_v14.patch application/octet-stream 4.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2019-04-04 08:25:16 Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2019-04-04 08:18:45 Re: pg_rewind vs superuser