| From: | "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Fabien COELHO' <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Timeout parameters |
| Date: | 2019-04-01 07:40:10 |
| Message-ID: | D09B13F772D2274BB348A310EE3027C648AD1F@g01jpexmbkw24 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi again,
Since Nagaura-san seems to have addressed the additional comments on
tcp user timeout patches, I still retain the status for the patch set as
ready for committer.
As for socket_timeout, I agree that this can be discussed further.
>Fabien Coelho wrote:
>> I still think that this parameter should be preservered on psql's
>> reconnections when explicitely set to non zero.
The default value of socket_timeout parameter is 0.
Shouldn't it be back to default value on psql reconnection?
May I ask why and how should the previous non-zero setting be preserved
on psql reconnection?
Regards,
Kirk Jamison
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Antonin Houska | 2019-04-01 08:01:05 | Question on alignment |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-04-01 07:06:10 | Re: Feature: triggers on materialized views |