RE: Timeout parameters

From: "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Fabien COELHO' <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Timeout parameters
Date: 2019-04-01 07:40:10
Message-ID: D09B13F772D2274BB348A310EE3027C648AD1F@g01jpexmbkw24
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi again,

Since Nagaura-san seems to have addressed the additional comments on
tcp user timeout patches, I still retain the status for the patch set as
ready for committer.

As for socket_timeout, I agree that this can be discussed further.
>Fabien Coelho wrote:
>> I still think that this parameter should be preservered on psql's
>> reconnections when explicitely set to non zero.

The default value of socket_timeout parameter is 0.
Shouldn't it be back to default value on psql reconnection?
May I ask why and how should the previous non-zero setting be preserved
on psql reconnection?

Kirk Jamison

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2019-04-01 08:01:05 Question on alignment
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-01 07:06:10 Re: Feature: triggers on materialized views