RE: Timeout parameters

From: "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Fabien COELHO' <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Timeout parameters
Date: 2019-04-05 04:39:36
Message-ID: D09B13F772D2274BB348A310EE3027C648D9CD@g01jpexmbkw24
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday, April 4, 2019 5:20PM (GMT+9), Ryohei Nagaura wrote:

> > From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
> > * About socket_timeout v12 patch, I'm not sure there is a consensus.
> I think so too. I just made the patch being able to be committed anytime.
> Finally, I rebased all the patches because they have come not to be applied to the updated PG.

I just checked and confirmed that the TCP USER TIMEOUT patch set v20 works.
Although you should capitalize "linux" to "Linux" as already mentioned before.
The committer can also just fix that very minor part, if patch is deemed committable.

Note to committer: The "Ready for Committer" status is mainly intended for
tcp user timeout parameter.

OTOH, unless there is consensus with the socket_timeout,
for now the socket_timeout patch status still remains as "Needs Review".

Kirk Jamison

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-04-05 04:59:36 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2019-04-05 04:30:52 Re: Caveats from reloption toast_tuple_target