| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: DROP CONSTRAINT patch |
| Date: | 2001-05-24 04:40:20 |
| Message-ID: | ECEHIKNFIMMECLEBJFIGIEKCCAAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> You can send me a totally new patch if you wish. That way, you can
> throw the whole patch to the patches list for comment and improvement.
I'll do that.
> Please keep going and resolve these inheritance issues.
It's not that there's inheritance issues in my patch. I am actually certain
that it will work fine with the ONLY keyword. However, I will make some
changes and submit it to pgsql-patches.
The problem is that although my patch can quite happily remove all
constraints of the same name from all the child tables, the problem is - can
we be sure that all the constraints with that name are actually inherited
from the parent constraint. Answer - no. At least, not until the add
constraint stuff is all fixed. So maybe I will just hash out inheritance
support for the time being.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Baccus | 2001-05-24 04:42:43 | Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-24 04:37:32 | Re: More pgindent follies |