| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: More pgindent follies |
| Date: | 2001-05-24 04:37:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200105240437.f4O4bWn01701@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I have no objection to this, if the process *is* formalized --- that
> is, we explicitly know and agree to probing for certain obsolescent
> constructs in each release. The thing that bothered me about this
> was that pgindent was pushing the envelope without any explicit
> discussion or advance knowledge.
Actually, as can be seen from the recent use of readdir() by WAL, often
new features/constructs get in when someone adds them and they get
through release testing.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2001-05-24 04:40:20 | RE: DROP CONSTRAINT patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-24 04:31:40 | Re: DROP CONSTRAINT patch |