Re: DROP CONSTRAINT patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DROP CONSTRAINT patch
Date: 2001-05-24 04:49:32
Message-ID: 200105240449.f4O4nWE02869@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > You can send me a totally new patch if you wish. That way, you can
> > throw the whole patch to the patches list for comment and improvement.
>
> I'll do that.
>
> > Please keep going and resolve these inheritance issues.
>
> It's not that there's inheritance issues in my patch. I am actually certain
> that it will work fine with the ONLY keyword. However, I will make some
> changes and submit it to pgsql-patches.
>
> The problem is that although my patch can quite happily remove all
> constraints of the same name from all the child tables, the problem is - can
> we be sure that all the constraints with that name are actually inherited
> from the parent constraint. Answer - no. At least, not until the add
> constraint stuff is all fixed. So maybe I will just hash out inheritance
> support for the time being.

Oh, I was hoping you could at least list _all_ the inheritance issues
for the TODO list. Seems you have found some already. If we have that,
we can get a plan for someone to finally fix them all.

What we really need is a list, and a discussion, and decisions, rather
than just letting it lay around.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2001-05-24 04:57:28 RE: ADD/DROP CONSTRAINT and inheritance
Previous Message Don Baccus 2001-05-24 04:42:43 Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem