From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: DROP CONSTRAINT patch |
Date: | 2001-05-24 04:49:32 |
Message-ID: | 200105240449.f4O4nWE02869@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > You can send me a totally new patch if you wish. That way, you can
> > throw the whole patch to the patches list for comment and improvement.
>
> I'll do that.
>
> > Please keep going and resolve these inheritance issues.
>
> It's not that there's inheritance issues in my patch. I am actually certain
> that it will work fine with the ONLY keyword. However, I will make some
> changes and submit it to pgsql-patches.
>
> The problem is that although my patch can quite happily remove all
> constraints of the same name from all the child tables, the problem is - can
> we be sure that all the constraints with that name are actually inherited
> from the parent constraint. Answer - no. At least, not until the add
> constraint stuff is all fixed. So maybe I will just hash out inheritance
> support for the time being.
Oh, I was hoping you could at least list _all_ the inheritance issues
for the TODO list. Seems you have found some already. If we have that,
we can get a plan for someone to finally fix them all.
What we really need is a list, and a discussion, and decisions, rather
than just letting it lay around.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-05-24 04:57:28 | RE: ADD/DROP CONSTRAINT and inheritance |
Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2001-05-24 04:42:43 | Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |