From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber. |
Date: | 2025-09-25 07:45:26 |
Message-ID: | E6E1F4E3-DABF-4F23-A64A-B7C883F2A9E1@gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sep 25, 2025, at 15:07, Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 1.
>> ```
>> + if (dbinfo->made_publication)
>> + drop_publication(conn, dbinfo->pubname, dbinfo->dbname,
>> + &dbinfo->made_publication);
>> + else
>> + pg_log_info("preserve existing publication \"%s\" in database \"%s\"",
>> + dbinfo->pubname, dbinfo->dbname);
>> + }
>> ```
>>
>> Should we preserve “|| dry_run”? Because based on the old comment, in dry-run mode, even if we don’t create publications, we still want to inform the user.
>>
>
> We don’t need to add an explicit "|| dry_run" here, since the
> made_publication flag already accounts for that case. In dry-run mode,
> no publications are actually created, so made_publication is never
> set. This ensures we still hit the “preserve existing publication …”
> branch and inform the user accordingly.
>
I doubt that. Looking the code in create_publication():
if (!dry_run)
{
res = PQexec(conn, str->data);
if (PQresultStatus(res) != PGRES_COMMAND_OK)
{
pg_log_error("could not create publication \"%s\" in database \"%s\": %s",
dbinfo->pubname, dbinfo->dbname, PQresultErrorMessage(res));
disconnect_database(conn, true);
}
PQclear(res);
}
/* For cleanup purposes */
dbinfo->made_publication = true;
made_publication will always be set regardless of dry_run.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-09-25 07:46:13 | Re: Fix incorrect function comment of stringToNodeInternal |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-09-25 07:32:40 | Re: Remove obsolate comments from 047_checkpoint_physical_slot |