Re: List of postgresql rogue groups (was Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general)

From: "Max" <maxdl(at)adelphia(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: List of postgresql rogue groups (was Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general)
Date: 2004-11-13 20:37:53
Message-ID: CDEJIJMPHJJNHGFMBPBKOEKMFDAA.maxdl@adelphia.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> barbara(at)bookpro(dot)com wrote in news:10outlgpkitaq20(at)corp(dot)supernews(dot)com:
>
> >>The other issue is that I would like to add the other postgresql
> >>groups for consideration to be included into the big 8. However there
> >>are quite a few of them, and I don't know if all of them deserve to be
> >>there. They are all under comp.databases.postgresql.*, and I highly
> >>doubt Marc would want to eliminate them.

I think Marc understands by now that these lists won't be eliminated. It's a
parallel process. Let's start with a few and create the other groups down
the road. An RFD with 21 groups has a good chance to be rejected, not
because they are not relevant, just because it's too many at one time. I
assume a second RFD should be 'filed' in 6 months with the remaining groups,
and should be nothing more than a cruise.

Nax

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dawid Kuroczko 2004-11-13 20:42:14 Re: How many secondary databases can I create?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-11-13 20:20:51 Documentation of server configuration