Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
Date: 2018-07-05 13:35:18
Message-ID: CAPpHfdsjXhqbPd8L42YMrd+KLdXKzMpVdyaMvDZE46sGqRF2xg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 3:52 PM Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 01:44:53PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > Well, I'm not sure that it's completely unrelated, but I see your point - it
> > makes sense to discuss this and move forward in small steps. So, if there are
> > no objections I'll mark this patch as ready.
>
> Thank you!

I tool a look at this patch. It looks good for me. It applies
cleanly on last master, builds without warnings, passes tests.
Functionality seems to be well-covered by documentation and regression
tests. So, I'm going to commit it if no objections.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-07-05 13:50:49 Re: Cache invalidation after authentication (on-the-fly role creation)
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2018-07-05 13:25:17 Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?