Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
Date: 2018-07-06 21:30:55
Message-ID: 69860.1530912655@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> I tool a look at this patch. It looks good for me. It applies
> cleanly on last master, builds without warnings, passes tests.
> Functionality seems to be well-covered by documentation and regression
> tests. So, I'm going to commit it if no objections.

AFAIR, the argument was mainly over whether we agreed with the proposed
behavioral changes. It seems a bit premature to me to commit given that
there's not consensus on that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-07-06 22:02:36 Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-07-06 21:10:18 Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query