Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().

From: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
Date: 2018-03-02 12:51:33
Message-ID: 20180302125132.GA25129@zakirov.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 01:44:53PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure that it's completely unrelated, but I see your point - it
> makes sense to discuss this and move forward in small steps. So, if there are
> no objections I'll mark this patch as ready.

Thank you!

Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional:
Russian Postgres Company

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-02 13:02:41 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-03-02 12:44:53 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().