| From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shohei Mochizuki <shohei(dot)mochizuki(at)toshiba(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BEFORE UPDATE trigger on postgres_fdw table not work |
| Date: | 2019-06-12 06:13:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAPmGK16LDH_mJ-VQ78655M2HaHpERibb1tRNWTNakALG-dNNSA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 9:04 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'll look into the patch more closely tomorrow.
I did that, but couldn't find any issue about the patch. Here is an
updated version of the patch. Changes are:
* Reworded the comments a bit in postgresPlanFoereignModify the
original patch modified
* Added the commit message
Does that make sense? I think this is an oversight in commit
7cbe57c34, so I'll back-patch all the way back to 9.4, if there are no
objections.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fix_fdw_update_trigger-efujita.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Timur Birsh | 2019-06-12 06:20:44 | [PATCH] vacuumlo: print the number of large objects going to be removed |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-06-12 05:48:45 | Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions? |