| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions? |
| Date: | 2019-06-12 05:48:45 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqGZFkKi0TkBGYpr2_5qrRAbHZoP47AP1BRLUOUkfQdy_A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 5:12 AM David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:53, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > The latest version looks good to me too.
>
> Pushed. Thank you all for the reviews.
Thanks.
I noticed a typo:
"...able to handle partition hierarchies up a few thousand partitions"
s/up/up to/g
I'm inclined to add one more word though, as:
"...able to handle partition hierarchies with up to a few thousand partitions"
or
"...able to handle partition hierarchies containing up to a few
thousand partitions"
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2019-06-12 06:13:56 | Re: BEFORE UPDATE trigger on postgres_fdw table not work |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-06-12 04:30:36 | Resume vacuum and autovacuum from interruption and cancellation |