| From: | Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: problem with large inserts |
| Date: | 2012-12-17 14:21:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAPTjJmrHpdr6aQVL1Rc4apmxkLOoBtNjAQz0wuO5vb0c-ScqnA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com> wrote:
> Lutz Fischer wrote:
>
>> I am running postgresql 9.2 on a windows 2008 R2 server with 256 GB and
>> the database is on something like a raid 1+0 (actually a raid1e)
>> consisting of 3x4TB disks (limit of what could easily be fitted into the
>> server).
>
> I never heard of a raidle. What is that? What sort of raw
> performance numbers do you get with bonnie++ (or if that's not
> available on Windows, the Windows equivalent)?
Google showed up this:
http://www.techrepublic.com/article/non-standard-raid-levels-primer-raid-1e/6181460
Seems it's "raid 10 for odd numbers of disks".
ChrisA
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-12-17 14:51:42 | Re: problem with large inserts |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2012-12-17 14:11:02 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow a streaming replication standby to follow a timeline switc |