Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow a streaming replication standby to follow a timeline switc

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow a streaming replication standby to follow a timeline switc
Date: 2012-12-17 14:11:02
Message-ID: 20121217141102.GE6676@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-general

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 02:01:20PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Hmm, is it possible that some WAL was generated in the old master,
> and streamed to the standby, after the new master was already
> promoted? It's important to kill the old master before promoting the
> new master. Otherwise the timelines diverge, so that you have some
> WAL on the old timeline that's not present in the new master, and
> some WAL in the new master's timeline that's not present in the old
> master. In that situation, if the standby has already replicated the
> WAL from the old master, it can no longer start to follow the new
> master. I think that would match the symptoms you're seeing.
>
> I wouldn't rule out a bug in the patch either, though. Amit found a
> worrying number of bugs in his testing, and although we stamped out
> all the known bugs, it wouldn't surprise me if there's more :-(..

Will verify and reach back to you.
In my test I was doing first promote slave, and later (like 2 seconds
later, and there was no traffic, but still - later) kill master.

Best regards,

depesz

--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-12-18 01:16:07 pgsql: Fix failure to ignore leftover temp tables after a server crash.
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-12-17 12:01:20 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow a streaming replication standby to follow a timeline switc

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Angelico 2012-12-17 14:21:08 Re: problem with large inserts
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2012-12-17 14:08:11 Re: How to remove n-first elements from array?