| From: | Raja Sai pranav <rajasaipranav0(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com, masaofujii(at)gmail(dot)com, darianlepikhova(at)gmail(dot)com, ayushtiwarislg01(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Assertion failure in WAL summarizer |
| Date: | 2026-11-11 04:00:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAPHduZANUbs3cUCstL=2GMqWJPoZf3xn4NoXyF7is8bHeobccg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Beyond confirming v4 applies and the suites pass, I checked that each new
test
actually reproduces its failure on unpatched master -- i.e. with the three
test
files in place but the code changes reverted:
- pg_walsummary/t/
https://www.google.com/url?q=http://004_promote_past_target.pl&source=gmail&ust=1794456004508000&sa=E:
fails at "the summarizer does not
read past replay", and pg_ctl promote then exits 1 -- the post-promotion
path
this series fixes.
- pg_combinebackup/t/
https://www.google.com/url?q=http://015_summary_past_switch.pl&source=gmail&ust=1794456004508000&sa=E:
the same "reads past replay"
failure on the standby, and promote exits 1.
- pg_combinebackup/t/
https://www.google.com/url?q=http://016_truncation_after_target.pl&source=gmail&ust=1794456004508000&sa=E:
the server terminates
abnormally during the post-promotion incremental backup
(pg_basebackup: server closed the connection unexpectedly).
With all three patches applied, every test passes (pg_combinebackup 147/147,
pg_walsummary 34/34, on an assert-enabled build). So the tests reproduce the
reported failures -- including the server crash on the
truncation-after-target
path -- and the series resolves them.
Regards,
Sai Pranav
On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 08:04 AM, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> v3 no longer applies on master. I did not see any new comments.
>
> So v4 is just a rebase.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | João Rito | 2026-11-11 04:11:13 | Re: Small fixes needed by high-availability tools |
| Previous Message | shihao zhong | 2026-11-11 03:25:00 | Re: Set 1s WaitLatch timeout if standby limit has expired in ResolveRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin |