Re: Assertion failure in WAL summarizer

From: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>, Raja Sai pranav <rajasaipranav0(at)gmail(dot)com>, masaofujii(at)gmail(dot)com, darianlepikhova(at)gmail(dot)com, ayushtiwarislg01(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Assertion failure in WAL summarizer
Date: 2026-11-11 02:34:20
Message-ID: CAGRkXqTYnTBaRd2npYw13vo11KtS9x4+SDwXAH0o++qtFk849Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

v3 no longer applies on master. I did not see any new comments.

So v4 is just a rebase.

Thanks,

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0002-Refuse-truncations-from-WAL-summaries-that-cross-a-t.patch application/octet-stream 10.3 KB
v4-0001-Fix-assertion-failure-in-WAL-summarizer-after-promot.patch application/octet-stream 7.2 KB
v4-0003-Summarize-only-replayed-WAL-on-a-standby.patch application/octet-stream 18.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ajin Cherian 2026-11-11 02:38:44 Re: Avoid using raw xmin of frozen tuples in logicalrep conflict detection
Previous Message shihao zhong 2026-11-11 02:07:58 Re: Print latency percentiles in pgbench