| From: | Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hiroshi Yanagisawa <hir-yanagisawa(at)ut(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? |
| Date: | 2017-04-27 00:42:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAOoUkxQLiEP7G+ceFCyLEkOZaMoavu-YisXUqZVzm4Z-avM+hQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:
>
> I wonder if we should also consider changing the standby error message to
> be a WARNING instead of an ERROR. So that if you try to start up a standby
> with hot_standby=on but master with wal_level=replica it would turn into a
> cold standby.
>
> Perhaps, you mean hot_standby=off here?
Regards,
Vaishnavi
Fujitsu Australia.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Huong Dangminh | 2017-04-27 00:54:19 | Re: [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-27 00:37:40 | Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start |