Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting

On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 2:09 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 10:28:43AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > I attach the switch refactoring that applies on top of current HEAD,
> > and the reindex_system_catalogs() removal in a different patch in case
> > that's too much during feature freeze.
>
> Both Look fine to me at quick glance, but I have not tested them. I
> am not sure about refactoring all the options into a structure,
> perhaps it depends on what kind of patch it gives. Regarding a merge
> into the tree, I think that this refactoring should wait until
> REL_12_STABLE has been created. It is no time to take risks in
> destabilizing the code.

I've run the TAP tests and it's running fine, but this should
definitely wait for branching.

> Also, as this thread's problem has been solved, perhaps it would be
> better to spawn a new thread, and to add a new entry in the CF app for
> the refactoring set so as it attracts the correct audience? The
> current thread topic is unfortunately misleading based on the latest
> messages exchanged.

Unless someone argue it should be applied in v12, I'll do that soon.