Re: pg12 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg12 release notes
Date: 2019-05-11 18:02:50
Message-ID: 20190511180250.yixtxt7kssydoauh@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 10:28:08AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 7:40 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > > > I think I have understood the nuances, as listed above --- I just don't
> > > > > agree with the solution.
> > > >
> > > > To be clear, I don't expect you to agree with the solution.
> > > >
> > > > Another thing that you missed from my patch is that bugfix commit
> > > > 9b10926263d831fac5758f1493c929a49b55669b shouldn't be listed.
> > >
> > > Why should it not be listed?
> >
> > Thinking some more, I try to aggregate all the feature addition commits
> > together, but often skip "cleanups" of previous feature additions. Are
> > you saying that 9b10926263d831fac5758f1493c929a49b55669b is a cleanup,
> > and not part of the feature addition? It was not clear to me of
> > 9b10926263d831fac5758f1493c929a49b55669b was a further enhancement
> > made possible by previous commits, or a "fix" for a previous commit.
>
> Yes. It's a bug fix that went in after feature freeze.

OK, commit removed.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-05-11 18:03:20 Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-05-11 17:28:08 Re: pg12 release notes