Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2

From: Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
Date: 2020-07-28 11:35:07
Message-ID: CANugjhtmgsir6SqPGGh74dcaEoWGVD3b3UpBJSrwhH14+zmW3g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

There have been no real objections on this patch and it seems to work. So,
IMHO, the only thing that needs to be done is perhaps update the patch so
that it applies clearly on the master branch.

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:31 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 2020/07/27 17:53, Hamid Akhtar wrote:
> > Applying the patch to the current master branch throws 9 hunks. AFAICT,
> the patch is good otherwise.
>
> So you think that the patch can be marked as Ready for Committer?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fujii Masao
> Advanced Computing Technology Center
> Research and Development Headquarters
> NTT DATA CORPORATION
>

--
Highgo Software (Canada/China/Pakistan)
URL : www.highgo.ca
ADDR: 10318 WHALLEY BLVD, Surrey, BC
CELL:+923335449950 EMAIL: mailto:hamid(dot)akhtar(at)highgo(dot)ca
SKYPE: engineeredvirus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Asif Rehman 2020-07-28 12:02:28 Re: proposal: unescape_text function
Previous Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2020-07-28 11:21:29 Doc patch: mention indexes in pg_inherits docs