Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
Date: 2020-07-27 16:31:00
Message-ID: 2e551df0-d771-7032-7952-184ceb508faf@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/07/27 17:53, Hamid Akhtar wrote:
> Applying the patch to the current master branch throws 9 hunks. AFAICT, the patch is good otherwise.

So you think that the patch can be marked as Ready for Committer?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Kondratov 2020-07-27 16:34:46 Re: [POC] Fast COPY FROM command for the table with foreign partitions
Previous Message Dave Page 2020-07-27 16:00:17 Re: Display individual query in pg_stat_activity