Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
Date: 2020-07-29 12:26:48
Message-ID: cf2a7a01-6099-31a8-f0d2-0a14a064d230@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/07/28 20:35, Hamid Akhtar wrote:
> There have been no real objections on this patch and it seems to work.

Thanks! So I pushed the patch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-07-29 12:42:05 Re: IDEA: pg_stat_statements tracking utility statements by tag?
Previous Message John Naylor 2020-07-29 12:03:35 Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?