Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Date: 2016-03-10 12:34:30
Message-ID: CANP8+jKPORaK2Xhuwc6KJ6qwfL8KiVZjxDw16sS0XoDe0Kh7qw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 9 March 2016 at 23:11, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:

> There hasn't been any movement on this patch in a while. Will you have a
> new tests ready for review soon?
>

I see the value in this feature, but the patch itself needs work and
probably some slimming down/reality and a good spellcheck.

If someone takes this on soon it can go into 9.6, otherwise I vote to
reject this early to avoid wasting review time.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2016-03-10 12:43:21 Re: WAL log only necessary part of 2PC GID
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2016-03-10 12:26:23 Re: Identifying a message in emit_log_hook.

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-03-10 14:08:18 Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way"
Previous Message Pavel Raiskup 2016-03-10 06:14:13 Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way"