Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Date: 2016-03-16 23:17:12
Message-ID: 56E9E978.5090103@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 3/10/16 7:34 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 9 March 2016 at 23:11, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
> <mailto:david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>> wrote:
>
> There hasn't been any movement on this patch in a while. Will you
> have a new tests ready for review soon?
>
>
> I see the value in this feature, but the patch itself needs work and
> probably some slimming down/reality and a good spellcheck.
>
> If someone takes this on soon it can go into 9.6, otherwise I vote to
> reject this early to avoid wasting review time.

Since there has been no response from the author I have marked this
patch "returned with feedback". Please feel free to resubmit for 9.7!

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-16 23:19:14 Re: [PATCH] Integer overflow in timestamp[tz]_part() and date/time boundaries check
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-16 22:31:10 Re: Using quicksort for every external sort run

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Raiskup 2016-03-22 11:48:20 Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way"
Previous Message Julie Buchanan 2016-03-16 20:37:12 job opening