| From: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit(at)tym(dot)im>, Andrew Ross <ubuntu(at)rossfamily(dot)co(dot)uk>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Jesse Jaara <jesse(dot)jaara(at)gmail(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nico Nicolas <nicolas(dot)lecureuil(at)free(dot)fr>, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, ago(at)gentoo(dot)org, doko(at)debian(dot)org, hhorak(at)redhat(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way" |
| Date: | 2016-03-10 06:14:13 |
| Message-ID: | 2432316.E9y0GgTWSA@nb.usersys.redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Craig and Dave,
On Thursday 10 of March 2016 12:19:33 Craig Ringer wrote:
> So ... any interest in doing this via Maven profiles?
>
> Dave and I agree that that's the way forward as far as PgJDBC goes. It'd
> let you avoid patching PgJDBC sources in the rpm spec and having to
> maintain that spec patch, while still building without needing things not
> packed in Fedora.
>
> Thoughts, comments?
thanks for all your good comments! This is definitely the preferred way
to go, Allow me some time to process this, I'll update this thread as soon
as possible.
Pavel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-03-10 12:34:30 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-03-10 04:19:33 | Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way" |