Re: More work on SortSupport for text - strcoll() and strxfrm() caching

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More work on SortSupport for text - strcoll() and strxfrm() caching
Date: 2015-10-14 23:11:15
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSe=dpV+g3dQartLpokTSykL0LxOAsg2+1RZY31Lk7_9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just add a separate Boolean
> indicating exactly the thing we care about. This doesn't seem
> particularly easy to understand and verify.

I'm not really sure that that's an improvement. But I defer to you.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-10-14 23:20:45 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-10-14 23:09:59 Re: More work on SortSupport for text - strcoll() and strxfrm() caching