Re: More work on SortSupport for text - strcoll() and strxfrm() caching

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More work on SortSupport for text - strcoll() and strxfrm() caching
Date: 2015-10-15 16:07:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYU51zw7E48fAogETOtdZqUwmaXTO-1wZXc3oEZOcAkzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just add a separate Boolean
>> indicating exactly the thing we care about. This doesn't seem
>> particularly easy to understand and verify.
>
> I'm not really sure that that's an improvement. But I defer to you.

Would you be willing to try coding it up that way so we can see how it looks?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-10-15 16:15:34 Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-10-15 16:05:53 Re: Parallel Seq Scan