Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Date: 2016-09-02 16:31:50
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRWy=7CYegFE3aTYk8DeBYzf+6KyDJS4aRQWQ-Xkz=mpQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> I'd certainly welcome that. There are Debian packages available from
> the Github version of amcheck, which is otherwise practically
> identical to the most recent version of the patch posted here:
>
> https://github.com/petergeoghegan/amcheck
>
> (This version also targets Postgres 9.4+).

There were some extremely minor changes made here compared to my V2
patch, which, ISTM, means that a V3 patch is necessary. I'll get to
that next week.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-09-02 16:32:51 Re: Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-09-02 16:30:16 Re: Tracking timezone abbreviation removals in the IANA tz database