From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) |
Date: | 2016-09-02 18:11:46 |
Message-ID: | CACjxUsPtakbHkx0fA9PG=HiBDt7SFa4U_8Wf50cYd0n-i=EAgw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'd certainly welcome that. There are Debian packages available from
>> the Github version of amcheck, which is otherwise practically
>> identical to the most recent version of the patch posted here:
>>
>> https://github.com/petergeoghegan/amcheck
>>
>> (This version also targets Postgres 9.4+).
>
> There were some extremely minor changes made here compared to my V2
> patch, which, ISTM, means that a V3 patch is necessary. I'll get to
> that next week.
I changed the CF entry to "Waiting on Author" pending that. (I was
starting to review the patch for commit, so it's none to early to
mention that the last posted version is not what I should be
looking at.)
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-09-02 18:16:01 | Re: Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling) |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2016-09-02 17:47:22 | Re: pgbench - allow to store select results into variables |