Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, David Zuelke <dz(at)heroku(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug
Date: 2016-04-08 01:36:16
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQwz+9vfmze3yupnXtKYFEsqJwgOmHGOW8M2h8bN0QsrA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I wish we could avoid the huge, repeated comment blocks. Perhaps we could
> put them at the top of the files once?

I'm fine with that. Do you want to take care of that, or should I?

> Also, why do you write 0UL instead of just 0?

Because the variable is declared as a raw unsigned long, IIRC. It
hardly matters.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-04-08 01:54:48 Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-04-08 01:23:27 Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug