Re: [Patch]Add tab completion for DELETE ... USING

From: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuya Kawata <kawatatatsuya0913(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Patch]Add tab completion for DELETE ... USING
Date: 2026-01-03 20:00:05
Message-ID: CALdSSPg8WGhfcaH-HUBU-CPjWQpKmsK1tw0O5S7cMnkPd8Scow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 27 Dec 2025 at 05:50, Tatsuya Kawata
<kawatatatsuya0913(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Chao-san,
>
> Thank you very much for your review!
>
> > Firs the first case:
> > ```
> > +# check DELETE ... USING completion
> > +check_completion(
> > + "DELETE FROM tab1 USING my\t",
> > + qr/mytab/,
> > + "complete DELETE FROM tab USING with table name");
> > ```
> >
> > Maybe just say “with tab”, because the rest test cases’ messages all say “USING tab”.
> I fixed it as you mentioned.
> The updated v2 is attached.
>
> Regards,
> Tatsuya Kawata

HI! What makes you think we need additional tab completion tests at all?
If we consult src/bin/psql changes history [0], it can be easily seen
that not every change to tab-complete.in.c is made with a new test.
This is (my own understanding, I may be wrong) because we only need to
test tab-complete patterns that are functionally different, not mirror
all cases from tab-complete.in.c in the TAP test.

WDYT?

[0] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commits/master/src/bin/psql

--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message M.Atıf Ceylan 2026-01-03 20:04:20 Re: [PATCH] psql: add size-based sorting options (O/o) for tables and indexes
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2026-01-03 19:47:23 Re: remove unnecessary include in src/backend/commands/policy.c