Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations

From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Date: 2021-10-06 15:14:21
Message-ID: CALT9ZEGhuXiH54VgyVJ65V+ccGqPqHTduBM4saPWSD2mrD5C6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Hi, hackers!

We've looked through the initial patch and the exclusion of temporary
tables from pg_amcheck seems the right thing. Also it is not the matter
anyone disagrees here, and we propose to commit it alone.
Supplementary things/features might be left for further discussion but
refusing to check temporary tables is the only option IMO.

The patch applies cleanly, tests succeed. I'd propose to set it as RFC.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov, Maxim Orlov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Judith Meyer 2021-10-06 15:55:20 Bug / Unexpected behaviour of NOT LIKE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-10-06 14:44:44 Re: Extension relocation vs. schema qualification

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-10-06 15:17:59 Re: storing an explicit nonce
Previous Message Мельников Антон Андреевич 2021-10-06 15:13:56 Re[2]: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements