Re: Extension relocation vs. schema qualification

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Verona, Luiz" <luverona(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extension relocation vs. schema qualification
Date: 2021-10-06 14:44:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY8FM7Vq-mJuS57eDbQuCiSZHmwvpnRD6R6Rcvcjog6YQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 8:26 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I spent some time awhile ago on fixing this via new-style SQL functions
> [1]. That didn't get finished for reasons explained in the thread,
> but I think that's probably a more productive direction to go in.

Hmm, if that'll solve the problem, +1 from me. I'm not a big fan of
giving up on the ability to relocate extensions. I know it's a pain to
support and I'm not sure that we have all the ideas we need to make it
work cleanly, but I don't feel like it should be intrinsically
impossible to get working, and I think users want it.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Borisov 2021-10-06 15:14:21 Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-10-06 14:16:31 Re: BUG #17216: No Password Provided Error - uncaught exception

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-10-06 14:53:29 Re: Compressing temporary files
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-10-06 14:41:43 Re: Triage on old commitfest entries