From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel Aggregate |
Date: | 2016-03-21 02:59:15 |
Message-ID: | CAKJS1f93KnK47JEN+Mbw1jLVPjJhXrke57tYsU5swZbR2S=MWA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 March 2016 at 15:48, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> David Rowley wrote:
>
>> I've rewritten the comment to become:
>>
>> /*
>> * Providing that the estimated size of the hashtable does not exceed
>> * work_mem, we'll generate a HashAgg Path, although if we were unable
>> * to sort above, then we'd better generate a Path, so that we at least
>> * have one.
>> */
>>
>> How about that?
>
> I think "Providing" should be "Provided".
Both make sense, although I do only see instances of "Provided that"
in the source.
I'm not opposed to changing it, it just does not seem worth emailing a
complete patch to do that, but let me know if you feel differently.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-03-21 03:00:23 | Re: pg_hba_lookup function to get all matching pg_hba.conf entries |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-03-21 02:48:41 | Re: Parallel Aggregate |