Re: Parallel Aggregate

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregate
Date: 2016-03-21 02:59:15
Message-ID: CAKJS1f93KnK47JEN+Mbw1jLVPjJhXrke57tYsU5swZbR2S=MWA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21 March 2016 at 15:48, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> David Rowley wrote:
>
>> I've rewritten the comment to become:
>>
>> /*
>> * Providing that the estimated size of the hashtable does not exceed
>> * work_mem, we'll generate a HashAgg Path, although if we were unable
>> * to sort above, then we'd better generate a Path, so that we at least
>> * have one.
>> */
>>
>> How about that?
>
> I think "Providing" should be "Provided".

Both make sense, although I do only see instances of "Provided that"
in the source.
I'm not opposed to changing it, it just does not seem worth emailing a
complete patch to do that, but let me know if you feel differently.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-21 03:00:23 Re: pg_hba_lookup function to get all matching pg_hba.conf entries
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-21 02:48:41 Re: Parallel Aggregate