Re: Parallel Aggregate

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregate
Date: 2016-03-21 02:48:41
Message-ID: 20160321024841.GA351174@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley wrote:

> I've rewritten the comment to become:
>
> /*
> * Providing that the estimated size of the hashtable does not exceed
> * work_mem, we'll generate a HashAgg Path, although if we were unable
> * to sort above, then we'd better generate a Path, so that we at least
> * have one.
> */
>
> How about that?

I think "Providing" should be "Provided".

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2016-03-21 02:59:15 Re: Parallel Aggregate
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-03-21 01:44:58 Re: Combining Aggregates