| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |
| Date: | 2018-07-03 06:11:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20180703061119.GA11732@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:00:46PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> Thanks for fixing it up. It looks fine apart from "Temporation" should
> be "Temporary".
Of course, thanks.
> I think it should be backpatched to v11 and v10. Your original commit
> went there too. I don't see any reason to do any different here than
> what you did with the original commit.
expand_partitioned_rtentry is new as of v11. Or you mean to tweak
expand_inherited_rtentry() perhaps? I am not sure that it is worth it
as the code has already diverged between 10 and 11.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-07-03 06:16:40 | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-07-03 06:00:46 | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-07-03 06:16:40 | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-07-03 06:04:23 | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |