| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Goodliffe <dan(at)randomdan(dot)homeip(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15063: Updates to temporary tables fail when there is a publication with FOR ALL TABLES |
| Date: | 2018-02-13 21:20:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZspN_ESXRrpR46U6pUS_9X2x-k2eon=HpCfy2E85zkUA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Dan Goodliffe <dan(at)randomdan(dot)homeip(dot)net>
wrote:
> Thanks David, I'm a Gentoo user... so actually I do... I can test (for my
> use case at least) any candidate fixes etc.... just need to know what/where
> they are.
>
> I'm a C/C++ developer by profession... so I don't mind get my hands a
> little dirty there if I can be of some help.
>
The convention here is to inline or bottom-post responses (and trimming
unnecessary quoted material).
Anyway, a patch was proffered on the thread I was referring to but hasn't
been acted upon that I recall.
Here is a link to the online thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5754c88e-0ea5-ee34-5b4b-e50a6c66822f%402ndquadrant.com
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Gould | 2018-02-13 21:24:47 | Re: response time is very long in PG9.5.5 using psql or jdbc |
| Previous Message | Dan Goodliffe | 2018-02-13 21:18:27 | Re: BUG #15063: Updates to temporary tables fail when there is a publication with FOR ALL TABLES |