> Anyway, a patch was proffered on the thread I was referring to but
> hasn't been acted upon that I recall.
>
Tried the patch, but I'm afraid it made no difference in the temporary
tables case. Tried adding a check that relation persistence was logged
that was in the same vein to the one in the patch (figured the problem
could also occur for non-temporary tables that were unlogged, but
haven't checked) but that made no difference either. I stopped tinkering
at that point cos I don't really know what I'm doing.