Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations

From: Andrew Kim <tenistarkim(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com, Matthew Sterrett <matthewsterrett2(at)gmail(dot)com>, byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com, slpmcf(at)gmail(dot)com, raghuveer(dot)devulapalli(at)intel(dot)com, akash(dot)shankaran(at)intel(dot)com, Andrew Kim <tenistarkim(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Kim <andrew(dot)kim(at)intel(dot)com>, eshe(dot)n(dot)pickett(at)intel(dot)com
Subject: Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
Date: 2025-09-17 01:10:56
Message-ID: CAK64mneJWJ4wsvzcDhP4XOdSgjxf=fba_OSpaF2_Uo5MmtXN=g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I don't know if this is related to the crashes, but it doesn't seem
> like a good idea to #include the function pointer stuff everywhere,
> that should probably go into src/port like the others.
Just a gentle reminder on this patch series — I’ve already rebased it on
the latest tip of master and addressed the earlier review comments:

* Moved the function pointer definitions into src/port as suggested.
* Rebased cleanly on the current master branch.

Could someone take another look and share any further feedback?

Thanks a lot for your time and review,
Andrew Kim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-09-17 01:16:58 Re: question about pending updates in pgstat_report_inj
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-09-17 00:35:30 Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset