Re: question about pending updates in pgstat_report_inj

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: question about pending updates in pgstat_report_inj
Date: 2025-09-17 01:16:58
Message-ID: aMoMCp8KfNCwBU_K@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 02:19:05PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 05:33:45PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
>> How about renaming "statent" to "pending" in pgstat_report_inj(), as
>> well? That would be a bit more consistent with the subscription stat
>> case, at least.
>
> 0001 LGTM.

Okay. Applied this way, then.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-09-17 02:01:03 Re: REPACK and naming
Previous Message Andrew Kim 2025-09-17 01:10:56 Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations